Saturday, December 1, 2012

Allowing "prevention of a greater harm..."

The link is to a South Dakota Supreme Court decision regarding the allowability of "self-defense" or "prevention of a greater harm" as a defense argument in a possession of marijuana case, a violation of 22-42-6.

The four SoDak Supremes who concurred in this joke of a decision are horses' asses. If you read it (shit like this is not easy to read) you will see what I mean.

Browse over it. Something will catch your eye. You'll read for a while and get tired of it. Come back to it tomorrow and scan it again.

Heres an example: "Ducheneaux cannot show that he engaged in the crime because of the “use or threatened use of unlawful force upon him.”

Is it not "unlawful" to put people in jail for saving their own lives while harming no one? The Supremes could have done the right thing. Instead they said absurd things to justify agreeing with an insane law.

http://www.sdjudicial.com/sc/scopiniondetail.aspx?ID=1203

No comments:

Post a Comment

Compose a username. We will delete comments posted under the name, "Anonymous." It's tedious and boring to view comments posted under "Anonymous."

If you don't want to register with Blogger, that's fine; just click the little circle in front of "Name/URL," then write something in the box that appears. Even your actual name if you like it.

You'll also have to write in the letters/numbers that appear in the image box to prove you are human. Thanks for humoring us. The comments will be much more entertaining with a variety of user handles.

If you have trouble reading the words you have to type in before you publish comments, click the recycle button until something comes up that you can read.