Thursday, February 4, 2010

Kooiker

I'm still gathering information. Jobs that pay preclude me from digging in as deeply as I would like.

But, does it seem odd to anyone that a complaint that had its origins in 2003 is being brought to public light less than 30 days before Kooiker is expected to take out petitions for re-election? Something, besides the utter disregard for Kooiker's First Amendment rights, stinks.

I don't know enough yet to post. But as soon as I have my hands on those e-mails, I'll be digging in and reporting to you, gentle readers.

Anybody have any idea who on the council, or other elected or high-level appointed officials, might like to try to smear Kooiker in hopes that he will choose to not run for re-election? Anybody think it will work?
at

1 comment:

  1. AnonymousFebruary 5, 2010 at 12:34 AM

    As for those who would like to smear Kooiker --- Hadcock and Hanks.

    ReplyDelete

Compose a username. We will delete comments posted under the name, "Anonymous." It's tedious and boring to view comments posted under "Anonymous."

If you don't want to register with Blogger, that's fine; just click the little circle in front of "Name/URL," then write something in the box that appears. Even your actual name if you like it.

You'll also have to write in the letters/numbers that appear in the image box to prove you are human. Thanks for humoring us. The comments will be much more entertaining with a variety of user handles.

If you have trouble reading the words you have to type in before you publish comments, click the recycle button until something comes up that you can read.